Last week, John Bottom (@basebot) from Base One Group in the UK took a unique approach to his presentation at the IDM conference. He designed an experiment to show 150 B2B marketers the impact that can be achieved with content marketing.
He asked attendees to answer the following questions before the conference:
What the single biggest benefit of social media to your brand?
What is the single biggest obstacle to achieving it?
His firm then compiled all the responses into an eBook, Opportunities & Threats with the goal of getting it downloaded 1,000 times in real time during the conference.
The experiment fell short of the 1,000 downloads, achieving 570 during the allotted time period, but I'll bet there's more to come.
Take a look at what was accomplished:
Doing a search on Google for "Great Content Marketing Experiment" returned 320 results. That's how many people John was able to persuade to publish content about the experiment - from blog posts to media coverage to videos, etc.
Taking a brief look:
The number 1 result is a post on Mark Schaefer's blog {grow} that was tweeted 40 times.
RebeccaS posted it to Sphinn (a bookmarking site) where it was Sphunn 11 times.
A video taken asking attendees at IDM the questions used for the eBook was viewed 92 times.
The video John made explaining the experiment was viewed 172 times.
Social Media UK published a post with a slideshare about Convincing the Skeptics that was viewed 70 times and garnered 10 Tweets.
I could go on, but you get the gist.
In looking at the statistics on http://bit.ly/cUOsuY - the link to the PDF - it shows that 571 unique downloads happened with a total of 607 clicks. It also shows 63 tweets were made promoting the link.
But the interest generated didn't stop there. The link to the live blog where John posted about the experiment during the conference was clicked 477 times and Tweeted 92 times.
The hashtag #GCME was adopted and many more Tweets talked about the experiment.
That's a heck of a lot of exposure and engagement!
Here's what's surprising. Companies spend months planning launches. John sent his first email requesting support from his network on May 14th. The experiment took place 5 days later.
Some Takeaways for B2B Marketers:
Seeding is critical. This is why it's important to establish a presence on social media to build a network of people interested in what you have to say and share. Building credibility in advance of needing it is the key to John's success with this program. There's no earthly reason B2B marketers cannot create this type of response from their own networks if they work toward that goal.
Social Media is about more than lead generation. Because John spends more time being helpful than asking for stuff from his network, many of us were happy to help and trusted that the content he would provide during the experiment would be relevant and valuable to our interests. He did not disappoint. And, now, when we need some help, guess who will likely be first in line to give back? Yes, John.
We've got to get past this idea that social media is all about what it can do for us. The key is to always give more than you get. Just like you do with your best offline relationships. Online doesn't change that. It's just the medium.
Goose the Gate. If there had been a form in front of the PDF, do you think 570 people would have downloaded the eBook? Doubtful. But that doesn't mean John can't find out about a lot of the people who expressed interest.
- He can see who Tweeted and determine whether they're potential prospects.
- He can follow blog and Twitter comments.
- He could have placed a call to action in the PDF and monitored response to that.
- Or - and here's the big one - he could count on the contagiousness of his content to inspire people to reach out and connect with him. Yes, that happens with really good content promoted to the right target audience.
I know that the experiment was focused mostly on the download goal, but so much more was accomplished that it should inspire B2B marketers about how to create solid content marketing programs that drive results.
This does not mean that you enlist your network every time you have a new content asset. But, if you consistently produce contagious content, focus on sharing and helping others spread the word about what's important to them, what you'll find is that this type of thing just happens.
With social media in the mix, marketers don't have to go it alone. Grow your networks and inspire them to share your content. That's the new way of building awareness in a peer-driven, digital environment. All it takes is the willingness to let go of a bit of control and the creativity to create great content that your audience finds relevant and valuable.
Thanks to John for bringing this experiment to us. It set a great example for content marketing.











Ardath - thanks not only for supporting the experiment but also for great analysis.
In truth, the people I was trying to impress most were the 150 marketers in the room last Wednesday, but the results have given us all ammunition with which to fight many more change-resistors out there who still believe that social media is a broadcast channel.
Indeed, the very fact that the initiative has provoked interest suggests that there are quite a few people out there who may use the findings in their own businesses in order to promote good, honest, best-practice content marketing.
Which brings us full circle, because that is the very point of sharing information in the first place!
Thanks again Ardath - and to everyone else who supported the experiment
John
Posted by: John Bottom | May 22, 2010 at 05:12 PM
Ardath, for businesses it's all about lead generation. As a business I didn't start my company to support marketing people or programs. I don't live for pages views, unique visitors or tweets.
There is no mention of how much revenue he created as a result of unique vistors or page views.
How does the downloads translate into revenue. What's this guy's process of converting those downloads to leads. How many sales ready leads did he create.
How does he determine a tweet is potential lead?
Sales people and businesses know that creating visibility and awareness is a first step. We get that creating personas and customer centric messaging is important as well. We're also engaged in content management, lead nurturing and scoring programs.
However, generating revenue is more important than generating content alone. So now that this guy has a 1000 downloads, what was the revenue or customer acquistion he generated today - not potential revenue to be measured in 2012 - but actual revenue to date.
What does he do to follow up, convert to a prospect, lead or a customer.
Posted by: Jon Nugent | May 24, 2010 at 05:50 AM
Hey Jon,
I think you missed the point. This was a one-day experiment to demonstrate content marketing with one goal only - to get downloads. To prove the power of pass along and networks to build awareness and exposure and motivate action.
If John had the intention of running an end-to-end nurturing process with revenue generation in mind, he'd be off to a great start - don't you think?
Posted by: Ardath Albee | May 24, 2010 at 07:14 AM
Jon - appreciate your point completely. I use content marketing in my work and recommend it to clients as part of an integrated marketing strategy, and I wouldn't dream of suggesting pure downloads as an end goal. As you say, they need to be understood in terms of business value, a process which involves a lot more analysis.
But this exercise happened to focus on the early part of the process – the top of the funnel if you like – where I wanted to demonstrate how best to use shared expertise to increase awareness. So, in order to simplify what was already a fairly complex experiment, I chose a simple measurement, in this case downloads.
I think we're on the same side here!
John
Posted by: John Bottom | May 24, 2010 at 04:32 PM
this an interesting post! hmmm...... it should inspire B2B marketers about how to create solid content marketing programs that drive results.
Posted by: Nursing PJs | May 24, 2010 at 08:57 PM
John and Jon, one letter separates the two distinctly different approaches to the art of business... and helps the end user choose where to invest time/energy and ultimately money. Short term/long term, quantity/quality?? Thanks guys for making the choice so easy.
Posted by: Dale | May 30, 2010 at 09:40 PM